Conceptualize.
I wonder how am I in relations to another human being?
Have I made many enemies?
Well I have heard of the theory that we can never entertain all of them. Everyone, statistically, is bound to have at least one enemy during their lifetime.
So okay I got a few enemies. Even so, did I, instead, manage to treat all my close friends well?
Did I remember to say "Please," for every favor I asked and "Thank you," for each of them was favored?
I often wonder whether am I a good friend, a listener, in giving advice, in lending help, in refuse for other priorities, etc. I am selfish at times but do I pay my fair share of contribution to society in promoting altruism? (I just found out this word when I search thesaurus for "selfless" heh)
I want to be a good friend. Everyone, I believe, would love to be a good friend to their buddies. Why quarrel then? Because each of them is thinking the other person is not being a good friend. How is that possible? By law of mathematics when you add both negative of equal value you should get nothing, ergo, no issue. Unless the difference in values would result a loss or a profit in outcome of the situation. "You lose a friend," or "The relationship got stronger," given that the higher value leads the calculation. If the concept of multiplying is used, both negative or positive should end up of positive values. Meaning good guys will remain among good guys and similar can go for the bad guys as well. The difference in positive and negative regardless of which leads the incident would result in negative outcome anyway.
I'm getting there.
The objective should be two; the positive outcome which is preferred and zero as no issue is always a peaceful way to go. Under the rules of addition, by keeping our values as low as possible, we minimize the risk of loss in outcome thus the infinite target would be zero as peaceful result is the way to go. However, by keeping our values high, dominance would be an issue when your value is higher than the dominant in the calculation resulting a loss. However, naturally, when our value is higher, our dominance increases as well and by right the relationship should be stronger given that the value of the counterpart is much lower.
Oh well, that doesn't sound right isn't?
We go to the rule of multiplication heheh. Positive with positive and negative with negative. It's pretty simple really. Relationship is better off when u're with a person of similar style or value.
Really?
Schmehh~
I wonder how am I in relations to another human being?
Have I made many enemies?
Well I have heard of the theory that we can never entertain all of them. Everyone, statistically, is bound to have at least one enemy during their lifetime.
So okay I got a few enemies. Even so, did I, instead, manage to treat all my close friends well?
Did I remember to say "Please," for every favor I asked and "Thank you," for each of them was favored?
I often wonder whether am I a good friend, a listener, in giving advice, in lending help, in refuse for other priorities, etc. I am selfish at times but do I pay my fair share of contribution to society in promoting altruism? (I just found out this word when I search thesaurus for "selfless" heh)
I want to be a good friend. Everyone, I believe, would love to be a good friend to their buddies. Why quarrel then? Because each of them is thinking the other person is not being a good friend. How is that possible? By law of mathematics when you add both negative of equal value you should get nothing, ergo, no issue. Unless the difference in values would result a loss or a profit in outcome of the situation. "You lose a friend," or "The relationship got stronger," given that the higher value leads the calculation. If the concept of multiplying is used, both negative or positive should end up of positive values. Meaning good guys will remain among good guys and similar can go for the bad guys as well. The difference in positive and negative regardless of which leads the incident would result in negative outcome anyway.
I'm getting there.
The objective should be two; the positive outcome which is preferred and zero as no issue is always a peaceful way to go. Under the rules of addition, by keeping our values as low as possible, we minimize the risk of loss in outcome thus the infinite target would be zero as peaceful result is the way to go. However, by keeping our values high, dominance would be an issue when your value is higher than the dominant in the calculation resulting a loss. However, naturally, when our value is higher, our dominance increases as well and by right the relationship should be stronger given that the value of the counterpart is much lower.
Oh well, that doesn't sound right isn't?
We go to the rule of multiplication heheh. Positive with positive and negative with negative. It's pretty simple really. Relationship is better off when u're with a person of similar style or value.
Really?
Schmehh~







